The Tax Rates of Wall Streeters and Steelworkers

Agresti, J. D. (2015, September 12). The Tax Rates of Wall Streeters and Steelworkers. Retrieved from
Agresti, James D. “The Tax Rates of Wall Streeters and Steelworkers.” Just Facts. 12 September 2015. Web. 16 July 2024.<>.
Chicago (for footnotes)
James D. Agresti, “The Tax Rates of Wall Streeters and Steelworkers.” Just Facts. September 12, 2015.
Chicago (for bibliographies)
Agresti, James D. “The Tax Rates of Wall Streeters and Steelworkers.” Just Facts. September 12, 2015.

By James D. Agresti
September 12, 2015

During a rousing speech in Pittsburgh on Labor Day, Joe Biden said:

Why in God’s name should a man or woman working in a steel mill making $50,000 a year pay a higher [tax] rate than someone who makes tens of millions of dollars on Wall Street? … The tax code is not fair. It’s simply not fair. The wealthy aren’t paying their fair share.

That statement is demonstrably false, and like similar claims, it is based upon incomplete measures of taxes. To determine overall tax rates, one must account for all taxes and all income. Yet, politicians, journalists, commentators, and “fact checkers” routinely flout this basic tenet of honest accounting.

With regard to federal taxes, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) comes closer to the ideal of measuring all taxes and income than any other primary source of data on this subject. CBO accounts for nearly all income (such as wages, interest, capital gains, government benefits, and employer benefits) and 92% of all federal taxes (such as personal income, corporate income, payroll, capital gains, and excise). CBO does not account for the remaining 8% of taxes because it cannot reliably allocate them by income group.

CBO’s latest estimates of federal tax burdens are for 2013, and these show that households in the top 1% of income (averaging $1,453,000) paid an average effective tax rate of 33%. This figure reflects the actual taxes they paid; it is not a marginal tax rate that fails to account for exemptions or deductions. It is a real-world tax rate.

In comparison, households in the middle 20% of income (averaging $66,000) paid an average effective tax rate of 12%. In other words—contrary to Biden’s rhetoric—the upper 1% paid 2.7 times the tax rate of the middle 20%:

effective_federal_tax_rates_2013 What About Capital Gains?

Many claim that capital gains—a major source of income for wealthy investors—are taxed at much lower rates than ordinary wages. However, when all taxes are considered, the tax rates on wages and capital gains are in the same ballpark.

Although the highest federal capital gains tax rate on most capital gains is 20%, and the highest individual income tax rate is 39.6%, capital gains are often taxed twice, once at the corporate level and again at the personal level. As detailed in the Encyclopedia of Taxation and Tax Policy (and confirmed by the IRS, the Congressional Research Service (CRS), and the U.S. Joint Committee on Taxation):

Income that is earned by corporations in the United States is currently subject to two levels of tax. Corporate profits are subject to the corporate income tax. When these profits are distributed to the shareholders who own the corporations, these distributions are also included in the shareholders’ taxable income. …

The capital gains tax on corporate stock can be viewed as an aspect of the double taxation of corporate income….

After accounting for corporate income and other taxes, an investor who makes a million dollars in capital gains during 2015 will pay an effective federal tax rate of about 35%, while a worker who earns a million dollars in wages will pay about 42%. These rates are based on simplifying assumptions and no personal itemized deductions, so they are not meant as absolute figures but relative ones.

Incidentally, the tax rate on capital gains would have been 41%—or within one percentage point of the tax rate on wages—were it not for extraordinary stock market gains relative to inflation over the past several years. These lucrative returns have been fueled in part by the Federal Reserve’s policies of low interest rates and quantitative easing.

Another way to understand the nature of corporate taxes is to consider that the vast majority of U.S. corporations are structured as “passthrough entities.” This means they are organized under tax laws that unite the business and personal finances of their owners. Each owner’s corporate income and personal income are combined on a single tax return and are subject to individual income taxes—not corporate income taxes. Federal law prohibits corporations with more than 100 owners from being structured in this manner, but nonetheless, the corporate income taxes they pay are borne by (1) owners in the form of decreased profits, (2) workers in the form of reduced wages, and (3) possibly customers in the form of higher prices.

In the respective words of CBO and CRS, “households also bear the burden of the taxes paid by businesses,” because “corporations are not persons who can bear the burden of taxes, but merely legal entities through which individuals earn income.”

In sum, corporations ultimately don’t pay taxes; they collect taxes from individuals and remit them to the government. This is why CBO and other authorities on tax distribution account for the burdens of corporate income taxes, corporate payroll taxes, and excise taxes when determining individual tax burdens. Once this is done, the tax rates on capital gains are roughly the same as the rates on wages.

Ironically, those who have published income-based tax comparisons that exclude corporate income taxes often make it a point to include corporate payroll taxes. This inconsistent methodology is behind misleading and oft-repeated claims that Warren Buffett pays a lower federal tax rate than his secretary and that Mitt Romney pays a lower federal tax rate than middle-income earners.

How About State and Local Taxes?

With regard to state and local taxes, CBO explains that their distribution by income is enigmatic and debatable:

Because of the complexity of estimating state and local taxes for individual households, this report considers federal taxes only. Researchers differ about whether state and local taxes are, on net, regressive, proportional, or slightly progressive, but most agree that state and local taxes are less progressive than federal taxes.

Given the fact that (1) federal tax rates climb sharply with income (2) state and local tax rates are too close to call in terms of their burden on differing income groups, (3) federal taxes are about twice as high as state and local taxes—Biden’s claim that middle-income earners pay a higher tax rate than high-income earners is not remotely plausible.

So how can the vice president of the United States utter such a blatant falsehood without the press holding him accountable? Because the press has been spreading the same fiction. A small sample of those who have done this includes the Washington Post, the Daily Beast, Newsmax, the Providence Journal, the New York Times,, PolitiFact, CBS, and Agence France-Presse.

As a result of such disinformation, the public has become grossly deceived about this issue. For three consecutive years, a scientific, nationwide poll commissioned by Just Facts has found that about 80% of voters believe middle-income earners pay a higher average federal tax rate than the upper 1%. This includes 93% of Democratic voters, 71% of Republican voters, and 71% of third-party voters.

While a misinformed electorate may serve certain political agendas, it comes at a steep cost. In the words of John F. Kennedy, “only an educated and informed people will be a free people,” and “the ignorance of one voter in a democracy impairs the security of all.”

  • September 14, 2015 at 11:41 AM

    I think without having access to old data this report about paying a fair share of taxes somehow ignores the impact of write offs deductions-foreign corporate
    parking of profits . It’s not how much the tax rates are that is important it’s what the corporations and wealthy actually pay when all tax loopholes are figured in.

    • September 14, 2015 at 3:59 PM

      To the contrary, the CBO tax data cited in this article accounts for write-offs, deductions, loopholes, etc. As the article states, these are “effective tax rates,” which means that they account for the taxes actually paid. I will add a sentence to make this point clearer.

  • March 14, 2016 at 12:59 PM

    As far as “CBO does not account for the remaining 8% of taxes because it cannot reliably allocate them by income group” – this seems to be a really big deal as the differences in between the different groups are often less than 8%. If you want to be accurate, then you should at least include error bars on your graphs.

    Of course, there is also the issue that we pay more than just federal taxes. Obviously adding in other taxes makes it much harder to get a clear picture, but it would be interesting to see a graph that includes all tax averages – with error bars!

    I would also be interested to know if you are counting social security and medicare taxes in your graph.

    • September 18, 2018 at 9:34 AM

      Yes, this includes Social Security and Medicare taxes. As the article states, the data accounts for payroll taxes.

      The differences between groups are far more than 8%. The portion of unaccounted federal taxes and people’s effective tax rates are two very different things. You are also confusing a percentage difference with a difference in percentage points. Again, not the same.


Make a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Articles by Topic