Parental Cannabis Use
Are U.S. parents of children younger than 18 years of age more likely to consume alcohol or cannabis on a daily basis?
Correct Answer
Based on a “nationally representative sample of U.S. residents,” a recent study in the journal Addictive Behaviors found that “parents are now 4 times more likely to use cannabis daily than to use alcohol daily …. 5.2% vs. 1.3%.” The study also found that among parental cannabis users, “the most common form remains smoking (82%),” which doesn’t “align with the notion that parents who use cannabis would prefer products that are easier to conceal from their children, less likely to produce secondhand smoke exposure, or are less potent.” Citing earlier studies, this new study notes that “cannabis use accounts for an increasingly large public health burden, including hospitalizations …. traffic fatalities … and lost productivity….”
DocumentationAddictive Behaviors Study
Fair Share of Taxes
This is the latest In Fact. Click the left arrow for earlier ones.U.S. Senate candidate Troy Jackson (D–ME) claims that he will “make a fair tax system where middle-class people don’t pick up all the burden.”
IN FACT, middle-income households pay an average of $13,200 per year in federal taxes, while the top 20% pay an average of $106,300, and the top 1% pay an average of $826,400. Here are the specifics:
- Unlike the incomplete and misleading tax statistics reported by the media and politicians, the Congressional Budget Office estimates the federal tax burdens of different income groups based on their actual taxes paid (not marginal tax rates) while accounting for nearly all forms of income and all types of taxes, such as wages, salaries, capital gains, dividends, pensions, health benefits, payroll taxes, excise taxes, corporate taxes, hidden taxes, and write-offs (aka preferences).
- These data show that the poorest 20% of households pay an average of $100 per year in federal taxes, an effective tax rate of 0.2%.
- The second poorest 20% of households pay an average of $6,000 per year in federal taxes, an effective tax rate of 8.2%.
- The middle 20% of households pay an average of $13,200 per year in federal taxes, an effective tax rate of 12.7%.
- The second richest 20% of households pay an average of $25,700 per year in federal taxes, an effective tax rate of 17.0%.
- The richest 20% of households pay an average of $106,300 per year in federal taxes, an effective tax rate of 25.9%.
- The richest 1% of households pay an average of $826,400 per year in federal taxes, an effective tax rate of 32.3%.
- Using methods that vary from the Congressional Budget Office’s, the U.S. Treasury Department estimates that the richest 0.1% of households pay an average of $3,689,000 per year in federal taxes, an effective tax rate of 33.4%.
- Over the full span of CBO data — which dates back to 1979 — the effective federal tax rates of the richest 1% have averaged from 29% to 32% during every decade with no upward or downward trend.
- Since the 1940s, federal revenues in every decade have averaged 17% to 19% of the U.S. economy with no upward or downward trend.
- Although Republicans and Democrats enacted numerous “tax cuts” during those decades, most of them were actually “tax evens” which correct for “bracket creep” that consumes an ever-growing share of people’s incomes over time due to tax laws that aren’t indexed for inflation or wage growth.
- Similarly, the Reagan tax cuts of 1986 — which lowered the top personal income tax bracket from 50% to 28% — eliminated so many tax preferences that the richest 20% of households paid higher tax rates after the law was enacted.
- Despite these facts, Jackson and other Democrats have repeatedly alleged that the rich don’t pay their “fair share” of taxes without specifying what that share should be.
















