Fact-based poll reveals fictions believed by voters

By James D. Agresti
October 23, 2012

What do voters truly understand about public policy issues? To scientifically determine this, Just Facts, a think tank dedicated to researching and publishing verifiable facts about public policy, commissioned a nationwide poll of likely voters. The poll consisted of 20 key questions—two concerning voters’ political views and 18 dealing with their knowledge of public policy issues.

The questions were designed to identify fault lines between perception and reality across the political spectrum. Among the issues addressed are government spending, the national debt, taxes, healthcare, Medicare, global warming, pollution, and Social Security. For instance, voters were asked:

Do you think the federal government spends more money on social programs, such as Medicare, education, and food stamps … or does the federal government spend more money on national defense, such as the Army, Navy, and missile defense?

The poll found deep partisan divides, with both Romney and Obama voters being relatively more or less knowledgeable depending upon the questions. Overall, voters were poorly informed, and the majority gave the correct answer to only four of the 18 policy questions. These results provide ample evidence that voters may be casting their ballots based upon misconceptions.

The poll was conducted by Conquest Communications Group, a professional polling firm. The results were obtained through live telephone surveys of 500 likely voters across the continental United States on October 13-21, 2012. The margin of sampling error for all voters is +/- 4.5% with a 95% level of confidence. The questions and results are as follows.

Question 1: Do you believe that combined government spending at all levels—federal, state and local—now consumes a larger portion of the economy or a smaller portion of the economy than it did 10 years ago?

Correct Answer: A larger portion. Since 2009, combined government spending has been consuming more of the nation’s economy than ever recorded in the history of the U.S., including the peak of World War II. Correct answer given by 77% of all voters, 57% of Obama voters, and 94% of Romney voters.

Question 2: What about taxes, do you think combined federal, state, and local taxes now consume a larger portion of the economy or a smaller portion of the economy than they did 10 years ago?

Correct Answer: Smaller portion. Since 2009, combined federal, state, and local taxes have been a smaller portion of the economy than at any time since 1967. Still, these tax collections amounted to $3.8 trillion in 2011 or an average of $31,774 for every household in the U.S. Correct answer given by 19% of all voters, 38% of Obama voters, and 6% of Romney voters.

Question 3: Do you think the federal government spends more money on social programs, such as Medicare, education, and food stamps … or does the federal government spend more money on national defense, such as the Army, Navy, and missile defense?

Correct Answer: Social programs. In 2010, 61% of federal spending was on social programs, versus 22% for national defense. Fifty years ago, the opposite was true, and 53% of federal spending was for national defense, versus 23% on social programs. Correct answer given by 37% of all voters, 18% of Obama voters, and 57% of Romney voters.

Question 4: Would you say the earth is generally warmer than it was 30 years ago, cooler than it was 30 years ago, or about the same?

Correct Answer: Warmer. According to satellite measurements and ground-level thermometers, the earth’s average temperature has increased over the past 30 years by about 0.6 to 0.9 degrees Fahrenheit. For reference, a temperature analysis of a glacier in Greenland found that the location was about 22ºF colder during the last ice age than it is now. Correct answer given by 53% of all voters, 82% of Obama voters, and 28% of Romney voters.

Question 5: Again, thinking about the whole planet, do you think the number and intensity of hurricanes and tropical storms have increased over the past 30 years, decreased over the past 30 years, or stayed about the same?

Correct Answer: About the same. Data published in the journal Geophysical Research Letters shows that the number and intensity of hurricanes and tropical storms is about the same as it was 30 years ago. Correct answer given by 43% of all voters, 27% of Obama voters, and 60% of Romney voters.

Question 6: Now, just thinking about the United States, in your opinion, is the air generally more polluted than it was 30 years ago, less polluted, or about the same?

Correct Answer: Less polluted. Per EPA data, levels of criteria air pollutants have declined significantly over the past 30 years. The same is true for emissions of hazardous air pollutants. Correct answer given by 36% of all voters, 34% of Obama voters, and 41% of Romney voters.

Question 7: Which type of grocery bag do you think causes the least harm to the environment: Disposable paper bags, disposable plastic bags, or reusable cotton bags?

Correct Answer: Disposable plastic bags. In nine major environmental impact categories, disposable plastic grocery bags are better for the environment than paper bags. Likewise, cotton totes would have to be reused many more times than their expected life to have less environmental impact than disposable plastic bags. Correct answer given by 10% of all voters, 11% of Obama voters, and 10% of Romney voters.

Question 8: In general, who do you think receives a better return on the money they pay into Social Security: low-income workers or high-income workers?

Correct Answer: Low-income workers. People with lower incomes receive much higher ratios of annual benefits to taxes. Although wealthier men tend to live longer than poorer men, this does not make up for the difference in benefits, and it does not account for the fact that women (who typically earn lower incomes than men) tend to live longer than men. Also, people with higher incomes must pay taxes on their Social Security benefits, while people with lower incomes often receive refundable tax credits that effectively refund some or all of their Social Security taxes. Correct answer given by 39% of all voters, 28% of Obama voters, and 53% of Romney voters.

Question 9: Some people say that Social Security faces financial problems because politicians have looted the program and spent the money on other programs. Do you believe that statement is true or false?

Correct Answer: False. By law, all Social Security income can be used only for the Social Security program. The law also requires that any Social Security surpluses be loaned to the federal government, but the federal government is legally required to pay back this money to the Social Security program with interest. Nonetheless, even when this money is repaid, the Social Security Administration projects that the program’s trust fund will be exhausted in 2033, and the program will not have enough money to pay promised benefits every year for the foreseeable future. Correct answer given by 21% of all voters, 35% of Obama voters, and 11% of Romney voters.

Question 10: Some policymakers are proposing that individuals be allowed to save and invest some of their Social Security taxes in personal accounts instead of paying these taxes to the Social Security program. In your view, do you think such proposals generally improve or harm the finances of the Social Security program?

Correct Answer: Improve. Proposals to give Social Security an element of personal ownership are generally structured to strengthen the program’s finances. Although some tax revenues that would have gone to the program go to people’s personal retirement accounts instead, these tax revenues are more than offset by the savings of not paying these individuals full benefits. Correct answer given by 25% of all voters, 5% of Obama voters, and 47% of Romney voters.

Question 11: On average, who pays a greater portion of their income in federal taxes: The middle-class, the upper 1% of income earners, or do you think they both pay about the same portion of their income in federal taxes?

Correct Answer: The upper 1%. Per the Congressional Budget Office’s latest estimate of federal tax burdens, households in the middle 20% of the U.S. income distribution paid an effective tax rate of 11.1%, as compared to 28.9% for the top 1% of income earners. Correct answer given by 17% of all voters, 4% of Obama voters, and 31% of Romney voters.

Question 12: The federal government often gives special tax breaks to certain business sectors. Which business sector do you think pays a higher federal corporate income tax rate: Mining or educational services?

Correct Answer: Educational services. In 2009, out of 20 major business sectors, the effective corporate income tax rate averaged from as low as 16% for mining to as high as 34% for educational services. This disparity is a result of tax preferences. Correct answer given by 29% of all voters, 44% of Obama voters, and 19% of Romney voters.

Question 13: In 2003, Congress and President Bush passed a tax cut law that accelerated and expanded upon tax cuts they had passed a few years earlier. In the four years that followed this 2003 tax cut law, do you think federal revenues generally increased, declined, or stayed about the same?

Correct Answer: Increased. Federal revenues were 16.2% of the nation’s economy in 2003, 16.1% in 2004, 17.3% in 2005, 18.2% in 2006, and 18.5% in 2007. Federal data going back to 1950 shows that higher tax rates do not necessarily correspond with more tax revenues. Other factors, such as the health of the economy, also have a major impact on tax revenues. Correct answer given by 28% of all voters, 12% of Obama voters, and 46% of Romney voters.

Question 14: Most of the Bush tax cuts are due to expire at the end of 2012. If Congress and the President decide to make these tax cuts permanent, do you think in future years that average Americans will pay less of their income in federal taxes than they have on average for the past 40 years, more of their income in taxes, or about the same?

Correct Answer: About the same. The Congressional Budget Office projects that if most of the Bush tax cuts and even some of the Obama tax cuts are renewed, federal revenues will reach their historical average in two years and stay level thereafter. This is partly because many tax laws are not indexed for wage growth and some are not indexed for inflation, which causes taxes to continually consume a greater share of Americans’ income unless tax laws are changed. This is a phenomenon called bracket creep. Correct answer given by 27% of all voters, 26% of Obama voters, and 29% of Romney voters.

Question 15: In 1960, governments paid for 24% of all healthcare costs in the U.S. Do you think government now pays a greater portion or a lesser portion of all healthcare costs in the U.S.?

Correct Answer: A greater portion. Between 1960 and 2009, the portion of U.S. healthcare expenses paid by government increased from 24% to 48%. This is one of the primary drivers of increased healthcare spending, because when people don’t personally pay for their healthcare, they are less likely to be responsible consumers and more likely to use services that have no measurable benefit to their health. Correct answer given by 56% of all voters, 53% of Obama voters, and 64% of Romney voters.

Question 16: In 1960, private insurance paid for 21% of all healthcare costs in the U.S. Do you believe private insurance now pays a greater portion or a lesser portion of all healthcare costs in the U.S.?

Correct Answer: Greater. The same trend that applies to government also applies to private insurance. Between 1960 and 2009, the portion of U.S. healthcare expenses paid by private insurance increased from 21% to 32%. This trend has been driven by federal tax policy, which makes employer-provided health insurance generally exempt from federal taxes but not most medical expenses paid directly by consumers. Between 1960 and 2009, the portion of U.S. healthcare expenses paid directly by consumers decreased from 48% to 12%. Correct answer given by 41% of all voters, 37% of Obama voters, and 48% of Romney voters.

Question 17: Do you think that preventative medical care generally increases or decreases people’s lifetime medical costs?

Correct Answer: Increases. Repeated studies have shown that preventative medical care generally increases overall healthcare costs. As explained by the Congressional Budget Office, “Although different types of preventive care have different effects on spending, the evidence suggests that for most preventive services, expanded utilization leads to higher, not lower, medical spending overall.” Correct answer given by 23% of all voters, 16% of Obama voters, and 28% of Romney voters.

Question 18: In 2010, Congress passed and President Obama signed the Affordable Care Act, also known as “Obamacare.” This law uses price controls to save money in the Medicare program. Do you think these price controls will affect Medicare patients’ access to care?

Correct Answer: Yes. As explained by Medicare’s actuaries, the Affordable Care Act’s price controls will cut Medicare prices for many medical services over the next three generations to “less than half of their level under the prior law.” The program’s actuaries have been clear that this will likely cause “withdrawal of providers from the Medicare market” and “severe problems with beneficiary access to care.” Correct answer given by 56% of all voters, 23% of Obama voters, and 86% of Romney voters.

This is the first poll of voter knowledge commissioned by Just Facts, and plans are in place to conduct such polls on an annual basis. Politicians and the press regularly inundate Americans with information about public policy, but as this poll has found, the end result is that voters are ill-informed. Just Facts aims to correct this by providing voters with documented facts that empower them to make truly informed decisions.

The margin of error for Obama voters is +/- 7.2%, and the margin of error for Romney voters is +/- 6.9%. The number of undecided voters or those planning to vote for other candidates are too small to draw scientifically valid conclusions. The poll results for all voters are available here, and the results broken down by political views, age, and gender are available here.

26 thoughts on “Fact-based poll reveals fictions believed by voters

  1. The results of this pole has given me good insight on what is really going on in our gomernment. Keep up the good work.

  2. Question 4 questions if people feel that the earth temperatures are warmer or cooler. This question is irrelevant. The earth has had thermal cycle though its existence. We have seen hot periods as well as ice ages. None of this proves that humans are probably not responsible for the change in climate. There is too much money to be made by perpetuating this myth. Al Gore is an idiot anyway. I hope that the earth stays away from another ice age, warmer is better.

    • AND, the warmer temperatures and increased CO2 mean that plants grow better, and the growing-season is extended, so as to supply more food, more-efficiently.

      When you look at the long-term temperature history of he earth, it shows a repetitive-cycle over hundreds of thousands of years, mostly far-colder, and we are INDEED LUCKY to be living in a ‘warm’ period!

      And AlGore and his selective hockey-stick data and ‘Man-Made Global Warming’ that he got RICH on giving speeches promoting — be damned for the crime you have wrought!

    • I think the warming question is poorly worded. I being an avid reader of science journals know the Earth has slightly warmed over the 30 year period but I would have answered the question with “about the same” because a less than 1 degree F change is very small. The question should have been worded to include levels of warming or cooling ( 5F, etc.).
      If you look at the poll results and add the “about the same” with the “warmer” results you get the following. Dems=97.4% and Rep=92.6% or pretty much the same answer.

  3. I love “Just Facts” and only wish more people would follow it. By the way, I only missed 3 of the answers to the questions!

  4. I find question 7 true, but misleading, since it leaves out the fact that reusable “Plastic polypropylene tote” bags have less environmental impact than disposable bags if they are used to about at least a quarter of their full potential. The study Just Facts cites says that in every category, the benefit to the environment of this type of bag would kick in by 30 uses.

  5. Great poll, and informative. Keep up the good work. The level of ignorance in the voting public is appalling, but not suprising. I missed several of the answers myself, although I did better than the 4 question average.

    • Agree the level of ignorance of the general populace (and especially the VOTERS!) is appalling, and NOT a tribute to our expensive education-system, nor current-culture (might I call it ‘Kardashian-enthralled’?).

  6. Suprised at the number of answers I got wrong, did better than the 4 questions average as well. Keep up the great work guys! It makes a difference!

  7. Pingback: Separating the truth from fiction: social spending vs. military spending

  8. Love the website, and use it frequently. However, there is a couple of debatable ‘facts’ in this poll.

    The planet being warmer the past 30 years is likely not accurate.
    http://www.dailytech.com/Temperature+Monitors+Report+Worldwide+Global+Cooling/article10866.htm

    I think the issue is ‘ground-thermometers’ as opposed to atmospheric measures.

    There is also some debate about what should be done with the surpluses in social security. Though that seems to be more philosophical. It’s a moot point now, as we spend more on social security than we take in. http://money.cnn.com/2010/08/05/news/economy/social_security_trustees_report/index.htm

    All in all, very good site, and very good study.

  9. Pingback: Both Democrats and Republicans Pandering to the Retarded Voter… – FAKEDRUDGE

  10. In today’s world I’m not surprised that the majority of people surveyed, were correct on only 4 of the questions. I also believe, intelligence has started de-evoIving over the last 10 years.
    I was pleased w/ my score, but I also read, watch a wide variety of news & expected I would do okay. I thought overall the survey was very good; but I think a few of the questions are not simply black & white.
    EXP:
    The amount of storms every year. Yes we may have the same number of weather events, but weather events now, are usually much more extreme. Also, there are other variables to the: Paper, Plastic, Cloth Bag question, that should be looked at.

    Otherwise it is a good, straightforward survey.
    IGNORANT AMERICANS…PUT DOWN YOUR IPHONE & READ A BOOK!!!

  11. Pingback: This Week’s (Fiscal) Sign of the Apocalypse | Right Wing News

  12. Pingback: High-Income Earners Pay More Taxes Than the Middle Class | Jefferson Policy Journal

  13. Pingback: A WEBSITE WORTH VISITING | Just Sayin'

  14. Pretty good poll! I love this site. I only got 2 wrong. And no I didn’t vote for Romney or Obama.

    But I disagree with the Question #9 about Social Security. You guys say it’s false. That’s incorrect. It’s actually true. The Social Security fund is filled with a bunch of IOUs. There is no money in it. The money comes from the general fund. Payroll taxes are just an excuse for the government to tax. Read about the history of Social Security and how it was sold to the public throughout the years. It was sold as an insurance program first (what many believe); however, the federal government won it’s case in court by saying that Payroll Taxes were a “tax,” and that Congress, under the Constitution, has a right to impose a tax. Same parallel went with the Obamacare tax.

    In short, the taxes that the younger generation pays goes towards spending programs (defense, welfare, roads, etc..). And since there’s only about 3 workers for every retiree now, the money that is paid to current SS recipients is either borrowed, printed, or taxed. SS, Medicare, and Medicaid comprise most of the federal budget.

    Yes, technically by “law” SS income can only be used to fund the program. That’s what’s “said.” But that law is broken. It’s a lot to explain here. But read about all the court cases and you’ll understand the history SS better. There’s a lot more to it than just this so-called law. The case of Flemming vs. Nelson is one case that comes to mind.

    • Thank you for your kind words. Getting 16 out of 18 correct is exceptional.

      Regarding question 9, I fully understand that the Social Security trust fund does “not consist of real economic assets that can be drawn down in the future to fund benefits” (Clinton administration’s fiscal year 2000 budget). However, that is not the point of the question. The point is that Social Security faces financial problems not because the trust fund is comprised of federal debt but because the program’s finances don’t balance even after all the IOUs are redeemed.

      Also, the law is not broken. Examine the footnotes at http://www.justfacts.com/socialsecurity.asp#popular-looting_trust_fund. For example, the 2010 Social Security Trustee’s Report states: “Funds not withdrawn for current monthly or service benefits, the financial interchange, and administrative expenses are invested in interest-bearing Federal securities, as required by law; the interest earned is also deposited in the trust funds.” I have crosschecked this fact in numerous ways, and it is verifiable (as the research at the above link documents).

      Regarding Flemming v. Nestor, the crux of the ruling is that individuals don’t have “accrued property rights” to Social Security (http://www.ssa.gov/history/nestor.html), but that is different than saying that the program’s trust fund can be used for other purposes. In fact, the ruling states: “Surplus [Social Security] funds are invested in government obligations, and the income returned to the trust fund.”

      This is a complicated issue that is often misunderstood. Just Facts has covered the matter in depth in these two sections of our Social Security research:
      http://www.justfacts.com/socialsecurity.asp#impact
      http://www.justfacts.com/socialsecurity.asp#financial

      • Thanks, James. I’ll read more into it from those links when I get the chance.

        The way I see it is (and correct me if I’m wrong) that SS, Medicare, and Medicaid are the largest payouts of the entire federal budget (including Mandatory and Discretionary spending). It’s something like 40 or 50% now I believe and set to skyrocket in the decades to come. So, if they’re the largest payouts, then my math tells me that these programs contribute the most to our deficits and national debt because they are comprised as the largest spending programs in our federal budget. At least that’s the way I look it. And since our budget exceeds revenues, we have to borrow over a trillion dollars a year to pay for these programs. And then that money we borrow accumulates interest.

        Someone else can say that our Defense spending at 19% of the federal budget is over bloated too. I’m not here to necessarily discuss politics of what’s more important or what. I just want to know the facts and how it all works.

        You’ve stated on one of your questions that social spending exceeds defense spending. That’s absolutely true. I’m surprised how many people I personally know get that wrong. This started happening during the Nixon years after LBJ launched his Great Society.

    • Suzanne, please give some examples of facts they should verify and include – even better if you can provide sources. Do you know of another group that thoroughly researches facts and has a different selection [bias]? It seems to me that a number of important issues are extremely complex and it is almost impossible to find independent variables where a clear cause and effect are irrefutable, but a wider view of “facts” can help.
      We all have a set of core beliefs and biases and sometimes they get in the way of [legislative] solutions (and my belief is that legislation is often not the best solution and politicized legislation is rarely the best solution).

  15. Pingback: NYT Peddles Nine Separate Myths Touting Obama Sequester Ideas – NewsBusters (blog) : INVEST WEB

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>