Biden Family Corruption

In his interview with Candace Owens, Hunter Biden claimed that “not a single” part of his “digital footprint” showed any evidence of “bribery” or “really serious accusations of enriching, my father enriching himself.”

IN FACT, Joe Biden was heavily involved in Hunter’s illicit business deals, bribed Ukrainians with U.S. taxpayer money, obstructed justice, and enriched his family via the Chinese government. Here are the specifics:

In May 2017, two of Hunter’s business partners exchanged several WhatsApp messages about the Biden family’s involvement in their dealings, and one of the partners wrote to the other, “Don’t mention Joe being involved, it’s only when u are face to face, I know u know that but they are paranoid.”
The business partner who was on the receiving end of that message later stated, “The American people don’t fully appreciate yet the key role Joe Biden played in the Biden family global influence peddling … I would equate it to a chairman’s role in a traditional business structure.”
In May 2017, the same partner who wrote “Don’t mention Joe” sent an email to Hunter and two of their other partners in which he proposed how the “equity” of a joint venture with a Chinese energy company named CEFC would be “distributed.” He did this by listing the initials of the people copied on the email and numbers that add up to 100 percent. The last one says, “10 held by H for the big guy?” The only person copied on the email with the initial “H” is Hunter Biden, and a partner who received the email publicly stated that “the big guy” is “in fact a reference to Joe Biden.”
CEFC was an effective arm of the Chinese government, and in a 2018 voice recording, Hunter Biden described one of the company’s executives who directly paid Hunter $1,000,000 as the “spy chief of China.”
When the same CEFC executive was arrested by the FBI in 2017 for “international bribery and money laundering,” his first phone call was to Jim Biden, the brother of Joe Biden.
On July 30, 2017, Hunter Biden sent a threatening WhatsApp message to another CEFC executive stating, “I am sitting here with my father and we would like to understand why the commitment made has not been fulfilled.” Four photographs prove that Hunter was at Joe’s house that day and took Joe’s cherished Corvette out for a spin.
One week later on August 8, a major corporate shareholder of CEFC wired $5 million to a shell company that had a bank account balance of zero just five days earlier. This company then funneled more than $4 million to companies associated with Hunter.
One week later on August 14, Hunter wired $150,000 to a company owned by Jim Biden and his wife, Sara.
Two weeks later on August 27, Hunter sent the following WhatsApp message to a CEFC executive about a meeting at a New York City penthouse owned by the chairman of CEFC: “My uncle will be here with his BROTHER who would like to say hello to the Chairman.”
The “uncle” was Jim Biden, who made $65,000 per month on this deal, and the “BROTHER” was Joe Biden, as evidenced by Hunter’s use of ALL CAPS and the fact that Hunter invoked his father to threaten CEFC one month earlier.
On the same day as that meeting, Sara Biden withdrew $50,000 in cash from her company and deposited it into her personal checking account. One week after that, she wrote a $40,000 check to Joe Biden for a “loan repayment.”
In March 2014 — while Joe Biden was vice president of the U.S. and serving as President Obama’s point man in Ukraine — Hunter and one of his business partners began courting a major Ukrainian natural gas producer named Burisma.
The owner of Burisma was a notoriously corrupt oligarch named Nikolai Zlochevskyi who was under investigation by Ukrainian authorities and was on the verge of having his London bank accounts seized by British officials in a money laundering probe.
Less than a month after Hunter and his partner were granted access to Burisma’s corporate data and shared a briefing about the company, the White House announced that Joe Biden “will travel” to Ukraine “for meetings with government leaders and members of civil society” just 10 days later.
On the day after the announcement, Hunter sent an email to his partner claiming that Burisma needs to “know that we will not and cannot intervene directly with domestic policy makers” but that Hunter convinced “my guy” (Joe) to visit Ukraine, and he might do a “really good thing” for Burisma.
Hunter also wrote that this business deal “could easily become very complicated” and sent an email with plans to communicate secretly via phones not linked to their names.
Two days later on April 15, Burisma began making a series of payments totaling at least $3.3 million to a Delaware corporation that gave $708,312 directly to Hunter and $2.5 million to at least six different entities associated with Hunter.
When Joe Biden visited Ukraine one week later on April 22, he did a “really good thing” for Burisma by publicly promising Ukraine’s legislators that the U.S. would help the nation “pursue energy security,” a clear benefit to Burisma, which was the largest private natural gas producer in Ukraine.
In November 2015 — seven months after Hunter and Joe dined with a Burisma executive at a restaurant near the White House — the same executive sent an email to Hunter and his partners in which he told them to “proceed immediately” with getting “high-ranking US officials” to “visit” Ukraine and convince “the highest level of decision makers” to “close down” all “cases/pursuits against Nikolay” (Zlochevskyi’s informal first name).
The same email reminded Hunter and his partners that closing down these criminal cases was the “true purpose” and the “ultimate purpose” of their “engagement” and “all our joint efforts.”
Hunter’s partners discussed the email among themselves and plotted how to close the deal, writing, “Hunter, You need to” tell Burisma that we “deliberately” didn’t mention the names of the officials who will end these criminal cases “to be on the safe and cautious side.”
Hunter then replied to Burisma, “Looking forward to getting started on this,” and Joe Biden proceeded to do precisely what the emails stated.
Eight days later — or almost “immediately” after Hunter wrote that he was “getting started” — the U.S. Embassy in Ukraine announced that Vice President Biden will “visit” Ukraine within a month.
During Biden’s trip in early December, he attacked the “key targets” named by Burisma, including “the highest level of decision makers” in Ukraine and the “Prosecutor General.”
In Biden’s own words, he told Ukraine’s president and prime minister that he would withhold a U.S. billion-dollar loan guarantee unless the “state prosecutor” was fired. “If the prosecutor is not fired,” warned Biden, “you’re not getting the money.”
In opposition to a State Department briefing for the trip which told Biden, “You will sign our third billion-dollar loan guarantee,” Biden withheld that money until after the president of Ukraine forced the chief prosecutor to resign several months later.
Contrary to claims that the prosecutor wasn’t investigating Hunter’s benefactor, the prosecutor obtained a court order to seize some of Zlochevskyi’s properties — including his land, houses, and a Rolls-Royce Phantom — only two weeks before he was forced to resign.
The replacement prosecutor — who Joe Biden called “solid” — agreed to “close down” all “cases/pursuits against” Zlochevskyi’s in exchange for him paying back taxes and penalties. This led the owner to praise the deal, saying that it would allow his company to increase “production” and “attract international companies to Ukraine.”
After Hunter’s digital footprint became public, Joe Biden and numerous media outlets ignored and then tried to whitewash these revelations with patent falsehoods.

While Hunter Biden was denying these realities, Candace Owens sat there nodding her head and saying things like, “Okay,” “Right,” and “Yeah.”

Receive New Research